Hi msc,

Quote:
I agree with what you are saying. Your point is clear about the use of the language in the liturgy. Using the example of those who prefer the King James Bible makes your point quite well.


If you cannot understand the lanuage(Latin) how would the hearer know when to give Glory to God or when to say Amen so be it Lord Jesus.

I disagree on using this anology of the example of the King James Bible.I believe it is another method of keeping people in the darkness!

To prefer one Bible over the other when a person can not read them would be quite childish,it would be like ,I like the one with the blue cover over I don't like the one with red cover.

It would be like speaking in tongues which God forbids if there is no interpreter!

And even things without life giving sound, whether pipe or harp, except they give a distinction in the sounds, how shall it be known what is piped or harped?For if the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself to the battle? So likewise ye, except ye utter by the tongue words easy to be understood, how shall it be known what is spoken? for ye shall speak into the air.1Co 14:7 -9

In Christ ,Garee