Well budge,

I thought you don't want to read Mark 9:43-47 without looking at the context, history, etc cuz it's a deception of the RCC...
well, you change for one to another.
I don't mock God's word. Well, if you feel offended, I am sorry but the real problem is that I disagree with the way you guys interpret the bible.
You guys read literally whenever the verse is good to attack the RCC but don't want to read literally when the verse is against you guys. You guys are always able to make exception (Mark 9:43-47 and John 6) for what is literal and what is not.
Can anyone please explain what Jesus meant in John 6 when He said the verse:

>53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, EXCEPT YE EAT THE FLESH OF THE SON OF MAN AND DRING HIS BLOOD, YE HAVE NO LIFE IN YOU. 54 WHOSO EATETH MY FLESH, AND DRINKETH MY BLOOD, HATH ETERNAL LIFE; AND I WILL RAISE HIM UP AT THE LAST DAY. 55 FOR MY FLESH IS MEAT INDEED, AND MY BLOOD IS DRINK INDEED. 56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.

A parable, a methapor, a mistake?

>why not go back further where Jesus says that those that believe and behold and abide have eternal life before He eve mentions His assimilation into our lives which we know is another form of abiding.

And tell me why you read this one literally but not the one from John 6.

Well, time for school. . .
ttyl = )